How does eligibility for GusNIP produce prescriptions relate to fruit and vegetable purchases and what factors shape the relationship? A protocol for a secondary analysis of nationally representative data in the USA

Top Things to Know

Expanding GusNIP PPR to include frozen, canned, and dried FVs could improve program engagement and benefits.

Addressing barriers to fresh FV access in underserved communities is crucial for equitable nutrition security.

This study highlights the importance of flexible and inclusive policies in FIM programs.

Summary of Conclusion/Findings

The study investigated how eligibility for the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP) produce prescriptions (PPR) affects fruit and vegetable (FV) purchases. It found that eligible households tend to buy fewer fresh FVs but more frozen, canned, and dried FVs. Factors such as health disparities and community support influence this relationship. The study suggests that expanding GusNIP PPR to include various forms of FVs could enhance program engagement and benefits, highlighting the need for flexible policies in food is medicine programs to improve nutrition security in underserved communities.